跳到主要內容

Comments on Egypt: The Islamic objective of politics is "common good" by Jasser Auda

I was asked to translate the note I made in Arabic about the Egyptian situation. Here it is. The situation in Egypt is quite complex and I thought it was a wise choice not to comment on the many details. However, reading and watching many other comments and even fatwas, made me decide to state -for the record- my own stance on the Islamic issues and concepts related to these events. I will do that in quick points and avoid details and names, etc. 

- Politics in the Islamic paradigm is by and large not subject to fixed rules from the shariah. Political decisions are made on the basis of achieving public interest/good (maslahah). In this current situation, it is imperative to be open minded and flexible in assessing what is public good and what is harmful to the public, as well as what is possible and what is impossible. What is possible today is for the Islamist groups to continue to be part of the Egyptian political scene, and what is impossible logically is to return to their status before June 30, which is now simply history. 



- We are dealing with a "nation state", which is a different concept from the "Islamic state" that we knew in history. It is not a correct analogy -from a juridical point of view- to deal with a president as a "Caliph", elections as a "bay'a" (pledge), or even with a military coup as an act of "disobedience to the ruler". The former concepts are simply new concepts that have to be dealt with in a new way for today. 

- Leading a big, important, and strategic country like Egypt requires a lot of skill and expertise in making complex and integrative policies in all areas. Perhaps it is good for all to accumulate more experiences on how to effectively manage a country like this before running for the next round of elections. 

- Political power is not an objective in its own right. It is, again, means to achieve common good. Thus, the ends cannot be sacrificed for the attempts to achieve the means! It is not a legitimate form of "jihad" to fight for the means and ignore the ends in this context. 

- Based on the natural law of cycles, it is a wise decision to let the public anger against the Ikhwan and the whole "storm" pass and prepare for the next round, not to commit political suicide!

- Participating in uncontrolled street fighting that will certainly lead to blood shed of innocent people is a major sin in Islam. The sanctity of innocent people's lives cannot be compared with the sanctity of the rules of the political process. 

- In a "democracy", the ballot box is a measure of people's choices, but it is certainly not the only measure. People could change their opinions and impeach a leader if they are convinced that he cannot continue to lead them, whether they are "right" or "wrong", and whether he agrees or not, and whether he was judged fairly or not. People decide, and it is too clear to deny that a major proportion of the Egyptian population showed a lack of confidence in the previous system. 

- Conspiracies that changed the Egyptian people's minds could very well be true. However, even if the public opinion had changed based on lies and conspiracies, it is the ruler's responsibility to manage the crisis properly and seize opportunities to resolve it, which didn't happen. 

- Facing a large national army with amateurs carrying some light weapons is suicide, not just for the attackers, but also for their ideas, groups, and political projects. Wisdom is needed in dealing with this situation before we end up with another Egyptian cycle of brutal crackdown on Islamists, God forbid. 

- The Islamic proposal for good governance and ethical policy making is bigger than individuals, groups, and political parties. It is a valuable proposal that is much needed in today's world for Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Let's keep it alive!


May Allah bless all for the occasion of the great month of Ramadan. 
Jasser Auda

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

一場人道援助演講的感受

利用假日期間,聽了一場人道援助的演講。講者相當年輕,短短幾年在多個國家從事人道援助,那種歷練在台灣確實不多見。講者很有自信地講述為何台灣社會要關注難民問題。 對於年輕聽眾來說,應該是一場激勵人心的演講。人道援助並不是我的專業,稍微google台灣方面的資料,發現相關中文學術資料並不多。 但只要從事中東研究的人來說,從事人道援助並不是一件容易的事情,背後又有結構性的問題存在,如當地國的政策侷限、援助是否真的為當地人帶來成效,還是適得其反?從事人道援助的NGOs,是否可以真正了解當地國的根本性問題,還是在沒有選擇的情況下,配合援助國的政策,或是順應新自由主義架構下從事「人道援助」,間接成為加害難民的幫凶? 以上屬於實務層面。還有個人層面考量,若真的以人道援助作為終身志業,是否家人或親朋好友願意接受?另外還有更實際的經濟考量,從事人道援助並不會賺大錢,相反的在戰亂或政治不穩定的地區,經常會面臨龐大精神壓力及許多不確定的因素。若上述條件都可以接受,願意清貧過一生,這種從事人道援助者真的相當令人感佩...

麥加年度朝聖 逾150萬人已抵沙國 (又一翻譯錯誤!)

          沙烏地阿拉伯(Saudi Arabia)SPA國營新聞社今天(31日)報導,伊斯蘭教一年一度的麥加(Mecca)朝聖之旅,目前已有150多萬人抵達沙國。麥加朝聖是全球人類最大的集會活動之一,今年的活動將於11月5日達到高峰。   沙國SPA國營新聞社報導:「截至10月29日傍晚為止,來自海外的朝聖者人數已達157萬5千人。」   沙國朝聖部長(Minister of Hajj)艾法爾西(Fuad al-Farsi)說,今年由海外到麥加朝聖的穆斯林人數,可望達到180萬人,加上沙國國內70萬到80萬的朝聖者,今年估計將會有250萬到260萬人參與麥加朝聖活動。   今年的朝聖儀式將由11月4日展開,這一天剛好是穆斯林陰曆的朝聖月(Dhul hijjah,或the month of hajj)。   朝聖儀式將於11月5日達到高峰,到時候所有信徒會聚集在麥加城外的阿拉法特山。 傳說真主阿拉最後一次的傳教地點,就在阿拉法特山。 (傳說 really?)   麥加朝聖是伊斯蘭教的第五信條,也就是每位有能力的穆斯林,此生一定要到麥加朝聖一次。 =================================================== 伊斯蘭沒有什麼傳說,有幾分證據說幾分話。我們穆斯林今世是看不到 真主,不知道怎麼會有那麼離譜的錯誤,難道又是外電寫錯了~

哈馬斯是恐怖組織嗎?

壹、前言 自 1987 年底成立以來,哈馬斯即以「解放巴勒斯坦」為最終目標,但在以色列與西方國家眼中等同於「摧毀以色列」。雖然哈馬斯的解放巴勒斯坦核心思想沒有改變,但曾多次表明願意與以色列達成停火協議,甚至在 2017 年 5 月其發布的政治文件中,明確提到接受國際社會規範的兩國方案 (Two-State Solution) ,即承認與以色列有共存的可能性。 [1] 不過,鑑於哈馬斯不願意捨棄暴力路線,也不斷灌輸巴勒斯坦民眾抵抗以色列,致美國與歐盟至今仍將哈馬斯視為恐怖組織之一員。 今日歐美學者研究哈馬斯的學術文獻汗牛充棟,但對於哈馬斯是否為恐怖組織一事卻無法達成共識。認定哈馬斯是恐怖組織的學者指出,哈馬斯從 1987 年成立以來,從未停止對以色列的攻擊。特別是在 2006 年之前,哈馬斯在加薩、西岸、東耶路撒冷及以色列境內,發動多次自殺炸彈行動,造成上百名以色列軍警人員及平民的死亡。哈馬斯在 2007 年佔據加薩之後,雖然停止自殺炸彈行動,但卻改採投擲飛彈策略,造成以色列社會的集體恐慌。 但也有不少學者跳脫恐怖主義的角度,透過實際案例展示哈馬斯並非是一個單純的暴力組織。例如哈馬斯願意傾聽巴勒斯坦民意趨向,當巴勒斯坦民眾受到以色列壓迫時,哈馬斯順意民意向以色列發動攻勢;當多數巴勒斯坦民眾期待和平時,哈馬斯便會暫緩攻擊以色列,轉為投入巴勒斯坦之政治與社會服務。 本文主要在探討分析上述兩派學者的觀點,並提出一研究途徑,盼能有助於各界對哈馬斯暴力觀的全面理解。