跳到主要內容

How Does Islam Fit in Our Ideas of the West?


找到ㄧ位美國籍教授,研究領域幾乎與我完全重疊。不過那位老師的求學經歷與人生體驗,我還真是望塵莫及。


Loren Lybarger on the complexities of Islam

Ten years ago, Loren Lybarger, California State University, Chico’s new assistant professor of Islamic studies, returned to his birthplace, a small mission hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, and there awoke sleeping memories of an unusual childhood. The son of lay Mennonite missionaries, Lybarger spent his first seven years in a predominantly Muslim world, remnants of which accompanied him when his family returned to Cleveland, Ohio. “My parents created a sort of mini-Pakistan with Indian rugs and artwork,” he recalled. “They’d speak Urdu in the house.”

Lybarger’s Christian, service-oriented upbringing as well as his own leftist leanings during his undergraduate years eventually steered him back to Middle Eastern cultures, to the places and points where politics and religion come together. “How does religion shape identity, how does it shape the concerns that motivate people politically?” he queried. “One question I often ask students in my Introduction to Western Religions class—and Islam is included in that—is, ‘What is this idea of West, and how might Islam fit under our concept of it?’ I’m passionately interested in these questions as they play themselves out in various Middle East communities.”

After earning a B.A. in European history,
Lybarger spent three years in Palestine, first as an English teacher and later, after schools were suspended there by Israeli military decree, working for the Jerusalem-based Palestinian Human Rights Information Center. He earned two master’s degrees before doctoral studies at the University of Chicago’s divinity school.

While working in Palestine, Lybarger witnessed scenes that forced him to consider this country’s role in foreign affairs. “When I was in the West Bank collecting data on human rights abuses, Israeli soldiers would fire tear gas canisters directly into homes,” he recalled. “Pregnant women aborted as a result of this, and there were deaths by choking. When we’d visit families who’d experienced this, they would hand us the canisters and point to the line that said they were made in federal laboratories in Pennsylvania. In addition to M-16 bullet shells, here was a tangible signifier of U.S. power and its effect on real lives in material ways. What is a Palestinian to conclude from that tear gas canister?
How is the United States experienced by anybody who isn’t a beneficiary of American power abroad?”

Predictably, Lybarger is often asked to untangle the religious and political motivations behind the World Trade Center and Pentagon bombings. His answers are often nine parts caution against stereotyping and one part admonishment of U.S. foreign policy. 


There are things you can say now about Islam in public discourse and get away with that you could never say about other religions,” he observed. “Certainly since Sept. 11, the concept of Islam and violence has solidified in the minds of Americans. And with good reason, if all you know of Muslims and Islam is what happened then. However, those hijackers represented a religious-political movement that has a lot of supporters but certainly isn’t representative of Islam in its entirety. Islam spans an immense diversity of cultures, everywhere from Morocco to Malaysia, and now I think we can arguably say everywhere from the United States to Malaysia. It’s global.”

Although he doesn’t expect to find easy answers to the centuries-old complexity of Islam, Lybarger does believe in holding his own country accountable for its actions.
“What happened on 9/11 was fundamentally a religious act in terms of how it was constructed, but it was also profoundly political,” he noted.
“For a while after the event, many Americans asked, ‘Why do they hate us?’ Well, they is very problematic. Who are we talking about? Every single Muslim in the world? The question opened a window of opportunity for understanding, but, unfortunately, I think it has been closed with easy interpretations that get ourselves off the hook. I’m interested in putting ourselves very much back on the hook and taking a hard look at the roles the United States plays abroad.”

Taran March

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

一場人道援助演講的感受

利用假日期間,聽了一場人道援助的演講。講者相當年輕,短短幾年在多個國家從事人道援助,那種歷練在台灣確實不多見。講者很有自信地講述為何台灣社會要關注難民問題。 對於年輕聽眾來說,應該是一場激勵人心的演講。人道援助並不是我的專業,稍微google台灣方面的資料,發現相關中文學術資料並不多。 但只要從事中東研究的人來說,從事人道援助並不是一件容易的事情,背後又有結構性的問題存在,如當地國的政策侷限、援助是否真的為當地人帶來成效,還是適得其反?從事人道援助的NGOs,是否可以真正了解當地國的根本性問題,還是在沒有選擇的情況下,配合援助國的政策,或是順應新自由主義架構下從事「人道援助」,間接成為加害難民的幫凶? 以上屬於實務層面。還有個人層面考量,若真的以人道援助作為終身志業,是否家人或親朋好友願意接受?另外還有更實際的經濟考量,從事人道援助並不會賺大錢,相反的在戰亂或政治不穩定的地區,經常會面臨龐大精神壓力及許多不確定的因素。若上述條件都可以接受,願意清貧過一生,這種從事人道援助者真的相當令人感佩...

麥加年度朝聖 逾150萬人已抵沙國 (又一翻譯錯誤!)

          沙烏地阿拉伯(Saudi Arabia)SPA國營新聞社今天(31日)報導,伊斯蘭教一年一度的麥加(Mecca)朝聖之旅,目前已有150多萬人抵達沙國。麥加朝聖是全球人類最大的集會活動之一,今年的活動將於11月5日達到高峰。   沙國SPA國營新聞社報導:「截至10月29日傍晚為止,來自海外的朝聖者人數已達157萬5千人。」   沙國朝聖部長(Minister of Hajj)艾法爾西(Fuad al-Farsi)說,今年由海外到麥加朝聖的穆斯林人數,可望達到180萬人,加上沙國國內70萬到80萬的朝聖者,今年估計將會有250萬到260萬人參與麥加朝聖活動。   今年的朝聖儀式將由11月4日展開,這一天剛好是穆斯林陰曆的朝聖月(Dhul hijjah,或the month of hajj)。   朝聖儀式將於11月5日達到高峰,到時候所有信徒會聚集在麥加城外的阿拉法特山。 傳說真主阿拉最後一次的傳教地點,就在阿拉法特山。 (傳說 really?)   麥加朝聖是伊斯蘭教的第五信條,也就是每位有能力的穆斯林,此生一定要到麥加朝聖一次。 =================================================== 伊斯蘭沒有什麼傳說,有幾分證據說幾分話。我們穆斯林今世是看不到 真主,不知道怎麼會有那麼離譜的錯誤,難道又是外電寫錯了~

埃及議會選舉顯露國家未來走向 (新華網) 附筆者對Salafi補充

2012年01月21日 23:22:27 來源:  新華網 新華網開羅1月21日電(記者 李來房 田棟棟 陳聰) 埃及 人民議會(議會下院)選舉結果21日揭曉。穆斯林兄弟會(簡稱穆兄會)的自由與正義黨獨佔鰲頭,贏得佔總席位的近一半,成為下院第一大黨。 薩拉菲派政黨光明黨 成為此次議會選舉中的第二大黨。 觀察家認為,隨著新的政治勢力登場,埃及內政外交很有可能出現相應的變化。   新政治勢力上臺 此次人民議會選舉總體得到主要政黨和民眾以及國際社會普遍認可。前執政黨民族民主黨因腐敗等問題喪失民心後,人們通過投票箱把機會給予了穆兄會等伊斯蘭力量。 1928年成立的穆兄會,自1954年起處于非法狀態。穆巴拉克政權2011年2月倒臺後,其活動公開化,並獲批組建了自由與正義黨。經過80多年的經營,穆兄會在全國城鄉遍布網絡,通過建學校和搞慈善等活動獲得大量社會支持,因此穆兄會的自由與正義黨此次贏得議會最多席位在預料之中。 同自由與正義黨相比,另一個伊斯蘭政黨光明黨是一匹不折不扣的“黑馬”。分析人士指出,光明黨成為議會第二大黨的主要原因是:在埃及這樣一個文盲率高、貧困人口比例大的國家,選民易受宗教情感影響。光明黨所屬的薩拉菲派利用宗教場所進行宣傳,在低收入階層和邊緣化群體中獲得了很多支持者。 老牌政黨華夫脫黨和新成立的“革命繼續聯盟”等在選舉中得票不多,原因在于觀念陳舊、缺乏經驗和競選策略不當等。    國家體制可能變化 伊斯蘭政黨掌控議會,埃及未來的走向引人關注。新議會首要任務是選出100人組成的制憲委員會起草新憲法,國家性質、總統權力和軍隊預算等內容將是新憲法的關注焦點。 對于國家性質,穆兄會極力展示溫和形象,稱埃及將是世俗國家,非宗教專制或軍人政治。而光明黨則主張循序漸進地全面推行伊斯蘭教法,但不會強制,也不會效倣伊朗或沙特,而是採取不同的、現代伊斯蘭國家模式。 對于總統權力,自由與正義黨和光明黨均主張削弱。穆兄會認為介于總統制和議會制之間的模式最適合于當前過渡階段,並最終實行議會制。開羅美國大學政治係教授巴克爾認為,未來埃及總統將不再有絕對權力,總統和議會之間會相互制衡,以防獨裁。 而關于軍方預算,穆兄會總導師巴迪亞表示,軍方預算必須置于議會監督之下,軍隊移交權力後議會將對其掌權期間發生的流血衝突問責。伊斯蘭政黨的上臺,